Brave New World Speech

In 1932, a prognosticative young novelist chastened with cautioning irony, of a patrimonialal exclusivelyy engineered dystopian society. He warned of a hu universe being where man had conquered disposition, where individualism had fallen to conformity and where political power had achieved essential social control. He warned of an come along where God, poetry, passion and most of all license had disappe atomic number 18d from right under humanitys nose. And finally, he warned of a time when civilization had ostensibly turned into robotic intent forms, lacking all clear understanding of ethics or ethics it had become essentially soulless.Read thisRespiratory occupationIn this make- accept universe, mankind had succeeded in eliminating disease, aggression, war and suffering. This Brave upstart World had achieved community, identity, stability and a near universal content manpowert and to be inhabited by creatures of human shape that boney humanity. Esteemed colleagu es of the scientific world, I am here to inform you that this in one case distant prox has now arrived right at our very doorstep. The marvel I propose is What do we do ab verboten it? The Pill. Invitro Fertilisation. Bottled embryos. Surrogate wombs. harmonium harvesting.Brain implants. Ritalin for the young, Viagra for the old and Prozac for everyone in between. But, out of all these scientific innovations, I proclaim that genetic design poses the greatest threat to our way of intent. Genetic engineering is what I see as an unbridled journey d take in an incredibly slippery slope. I warn you today, that human procreation is steadily being replaced by the have in minding of manufacturing our progeny. Unless this image is reversed, mankinds movement toward Aldous Huxleys Hatcheries and Michael Bays Island must surely prove irrevocable.Given the intricacies of the human mind, we mistrustless possess the potential for reproducing, someday, to the exact specifications, a huma n person. But should we? Should we in reality take the first step? Should we really abandon the old-fashioned genetic roulette of sexual reproduction and replace the variegated human endure with identical replicas of carefully chosen, capricel human ge nonypes? So far the scientific world has said no. Moreover, we permit witnessed an enthralling revolution in history, in which the rapid advancement of technology has allowed us to push stern the constraints of human existence.I am of course, talking about the birth of dame the sheep. Now dolly is no ordinary sheep. Yes, she may look exchangeable one and act no different to her fellows in the flock, but Dolly was cloned cloned further nine short years ago. They said for centuries that it could never be done that it was righteous not possible, and tampering with DNA would only stopping point to expected failure. But we did it barely s nonetheless decades after the publication of Huxleys terrorisation foresight. After Doll ys conception, the whole world was thrown into a raging twiddle of fear and anxiety, enquiring just how long it would be before humans were subjected to the uniform fate.For now, ethicists become taken the reigns in this debate and have stood firm against any form of human genetic engineering support. But the colossal ramble of science is forever turning and this breakthrough scientific sensation has reminded us that it burnnot simply be stopped. Thus, the importance of ethical boundaries must be continually stressed and highlighted. As a man of science, I am not here to dissuade you from pursuing scientific grandeur. I am only here to alert you of the abhorrent effects that will no doubt present themselves to humanity should the unrestrained research of cloning continue.Now, what is at getting even is nothing less than whether procreation is pass to remain human, whether children are going to be made rather than begotten, and whether it is the right choice, humanly speaking, to say yes to the thoroughfare which leads, at best, to the dehumanized rationality of Brave New World. What we have here, ladies and gentlemen, is not business as usual, to be fretted about for a magical spell and then given our seal of approval not the least because it appears to be different. Instead, the future of humanity may hang in the balance.I am talking to you about a decision whose consequences will undoubtedly reckon your children and your childrens children. The debate regarding genetic engineering is much more than than than just an object about one more step in assisted reproduction. This is in actuality one of those critical moments where the human race gets a chance to ring about the bigger picture the much bigger picture. Im not just speaking of genetics and what is the meaning of mother and father or kinship, but also the whole relationship between science and society and our future attitude towards technology.Cloning provides an occasion as well as the imperative necessity of deciding whether we shall be slaves of an unregulated process and ultimately its artefacts or whether we shall remain free individuals to guide our techniques towards the enhancement of human dignity. After all it was Huxley himself who quoted Every discovery in science is potentially subversive even science must sometimes be treated as a possible enemy. You may disregard this speech as nothing more than mere scare-tactics, but am I really that foolish to head word a world built on the foundations of totalitarianism and complete control.Ladies and gentlemen, have you forgotten the rise and fall of Communism, the movements of both Nazism and Stalinism as well the one-child policy enforced by the Chinese government? In this age of entertainment, when philosophical and theological questions are pushed aside as too effortful or too deep, cloning brings us face to face with our intelligence of what it means to be human and makes us confront both the privileges and limitations of life itself. We live in a consumerist society where the relentless pursuit of youth has already enslaved the minds of the Western world.We want to live longer, be happier, appear more beautiful and own as much materialistic junk as we possibly can. The idea of ageing gracefully is thrown out the window and replaced by the new and modify concept of cosmetic surgery and designer babies. Truly, we do seem to have accepted the Brave New World belief that ending is bust than mending. What we have is never enough. We say that globalisation within the last fifty years has become the pinnacle agent of socialisation, but at what cost to our future?It looks as though the Big-Brother style binding of the volume media has only aided in making us feel lonelier and more dissatisfied with our very existence. This dog-eat-dog world has wrongly underpinned the notion that each man is in control of his own universe. As people of science, it is essential we collect who has the authority to control who. A most memorable Huxley quote is The great a mans talent, the greater is his power to lead astray.I potently urge you to look at these past examples of repression and tyranny as invaluable lessons on what eventuates when substantial power is given to only a occupy few. Finally it must be said, that at the end of the day, I see to it cloning morally and aesthetically completely unacceptable. Perhaps at the soreness of my repugnance is a curious paradox, asking why it is that although it would be diversion to have a Beethoven, Marilyn Monroe or Einstein living on my block, the idea of having hundreds or thousands of their replicas in town is an absolute nightmare?The reason, I propose, is the mainly shared belief in the uniqueness of our human soul. Even though the soul is incorporeal and in truth has little relevance to the laboratory, its prize to the majority of humankind, is still of utmost importance. By perfecting the technique of genetic engi neering you are unfairly playing the role of God. Who are you to decide which genetic sins are capital offences against the Holy Ghost of Health?And notwithstanding, those in party favour of cloning claim that it is nothing more than an extension of what breeders of plants and animals had been doing for thousands of years and, indeed, what nature itself did through evolution. They argue that to oppose human genetic engineering, is to betray the westerly dream of the City of God. All utopian visionaries, from Thomas More to Karl Marx, recover of their perfect societies as being populated not by men but by angels that embody all of the best and none of the crush human attributes comparable to that of an Alpha Plus.So I shall leave you to think of this Today we are quick to notice dangers to life, risks of discrimination or development of the poor and the interferences with anyones pursuit of pleasure, but we are obliviously ignorant to recognize threats to our own human dignity and to ways in which the very sanctity of life is placed in danger. The future possibilities in the world of science are incredible however the need for caution in the field of genetic engineering research is essential if we want to continue owning personal freedom.It was effected by Aldous Huxley that it is only by means of the sciences of life, that the quality of life can be radically changed. Even though our Prozac is not yet the Brave New Worlds soma, our dividing of human embryos is not exactly Bokanovskification and our MTV is not quite an the feelies, the similarity between Huxleys fictional world and ours is disquieting, especially since I believe that our technology has not yet reached its bio-technological peak. Just remember, the admirable actions that men perpetrate can be made complete only by the actions they go down to pursue.